The Patriot Act has a better purpose than could be imagined.
An incident was brought on his behalf because he had been jailed for such a long time with no charges filed against him as well as other issues that were in violation of his Constitutional rights. The evening before his case was to be heard by the Supreme Court charges were finally filed against him. It really is believed that it was only done so that the Supreme Court wouldn’t normally hear the full case considering that the Bush Administration might have been found guilty of wrongdoing. Ironically, no charges were filed that had to do using the allegations of his supposed involvement to detonate a “dirty bomb.” He had been charged with lesser much less specific crimes though Attorney General Ashcroft had stated when he was detained that the evidence against Padilla was overwhelming. Before he was set to stand trial, Padilla’s attorney tried to argue that due to the torture he had been subjected to therefore the amount of time he was detained he had been not mentally competent to face trial. A judge ruled he was eventually found guilty and sentenced to 17 years in prison (Martinez, 2007) that he was competent and.
On Monday April 4th, 2011 the House of Representatives reviewed the Patriot Act and voted to increase it to the 8th of December, giving the energy towards the Federal Bureau of Investigation and several other federal agencies to still use roving wiretaps among other powers that overstep our constitutional rights. February 28th, buy essay online 2011 was thought to be the past day regarding the Patriot Act since no legislation that is new been passed. With this extension, America waits for hearings to be held because of the Judiciary Committee. It and Democrats argued against the extension when it came down to voting for the extension many Republicans voted for. However, that which was a shock to a lot of was the undeniable fact that sixty-five Democrats voted when it comes to extension associated with the Patriot Act. One in particular, Democratic Representative C. A. Dutch Ruppersberger from Maryland, the best democrat that is ranking the Intelligence Committee, would like to see this extension all the way through to 2013. A number of the 27 Republicans who voted from the extension, such as Dana Rohrabacher, believe the American individuals will face the best danger of out-of-control prosecutions as well as the possibility for out-of-control spy networks effect that is taking.
Groups such as the privacy that is electronic Center (EPIC) and the American Civil Liberties Union (ACLU) are fighting for reform regarding the Patriot Act. The ACLU believes that law enforcement agencies will take benefit of the balance and make use of for this power to trouble innocent members of the Muslim-American communities. On March 30th, 2011, the ACLU appeared prior to the House subcommittee regarding the significance of reform associated with the Patriot Act, arguing that the Government tabs on communications with no proof is a violation regarding the American peoples’ basic Amendment rights. Senator Patrick Leahy felt that he wouldn’t normally support the extension given that it did absolutely nothing to uphold the government’s accountability. EPIC used the Freedom of Information Act (FOIP) to get reports on intelligence law violations from the Intelligence Oversight Board. EPIC has spoken on more than one occasion to your Senate Judiciary Committee to require the Attorney General to report to Congress any investigations that are unlawful the Patriot Act, yet this battle still continues today.
The lives of both US citizens and immigrant are affected by the power regarding the Patriot Act.
as an example, foreigners who seek education through grants, non-citizens trying to gain residency that is permanent citizenship, visas and work permits in the United States are being scrutinized under the new requirement system associated with Patriot Act. One quite high ranking official in the usa Citizenship and Immigration Services (USCIS) caused it to be clear then they will receive disapproval if there are any doubts regarding an applicant’s eligibility. More stringent government standards and thorough criminal background checks are just another obstacle produced by the Patriot Act. These rules that are new the Patriot Act also not in favor of all the checks and balances from the Bill of Rights that has been put into location to protect citizens’ privacy. A discomfort in what they do because their actions are subject to review if the government suspects they are engaging in anything terrorist related at that time, misuse of surveillance powers by law enforcement agencies were uncovered, including the 1974 revelation that the FBI and foreign intelligence agencies had spied on over 10,000 U.S. citizens, including Martin Luther King Jr. Today, citizens utilizing the internet in the privacy of their home feel. For online users, it opens the door for widespread surveillance of web surfing, e-mails and systems that are peer-to-peer. Also put in the middle of the arguments are companies and public libraries that have to turn over any potentially incriminating documents accessed through their systems, in the request of federal police force agencies, without giving any notification with their customers.
I really believe that particular facets of the Patriot Act are feasible, but only with intensive oversight not only from Congress, but additionally through the Supreme Court. Congress can be the cause by ensuring that the statutory laws they pass do not go against the protections promised to Americans in the First, Fourth, Fifth, Ninth, and Fourteenth Amendments of the Constitution. The Supreme Court could continue steadily to review cases to ensure that the Constitution is upheld even if it comes down to cases that deal with suspected terrorists which can be American citizens. Our laws have made this country what it really is today however it is feared that money maybe the downfall of our nation. The freedom of life, liberty and property has turned into greed. Terrorist acts against the US terrify many Americans, but in many cases, money and power scares them more. The people vote to have government representation however the social people need to be more involved with the decision making process. In the event that you elect someone to office plus they do not get the job done correctly, it is as much as us as Americans to make certain that the individuals try not to stay static in office. That will simply be done if people get more involved in the political process and not only be happy with what are the results.
The expression “land of the free” can be used too generously. Just how it is now, the Patriot Act goes against everything that this country is short for and deprives all of us of your civil liberties. Some argue it is required to maintain order, however you cannot give limitless capacity to a few and expect what to come out well. If the Patriot Act is usually to be kept as law, the people that individuals elect to the House of Representatives (House) and Senate have to hold the people who make use of it accountable who overstep or abuse the energy directed at them. Also, the president should not be the deciding factor in deeming an individual a “threat” or “enemy combatant” when giving an individual such a title strips them of basic human rights. When it is unacceptable for soldiers in war to commit crimes contrary to the individuals of the nation they’ve been occupying, it must be unacceptable for authorities to use tactics that are considered torture when wanting to elicit information from an individual, whether see your face be an American citizen or otherwise not.
A brief history of the Patriot Act actually dates back towards the eighteenth century under different laws placed into place during war time to protect the united states.
The protection of your nation could be the highest together with most important responsibility of your government. The laws created are supposed to be within the best interest associated with citizens. Most likely, the citizens supply the government the ability to provide for their welfare and to protect them. Individuals with this level of power sometimes focus on the whole without rational additionally the individual has to pay the cost. There ought to be a limit from the power regarding the government, if the nation’s life style, liberty and pursuit of property come in jeopardy we have to look at the rational the federal government uses when governing this nation. We can’t as a nation just sit back and accept what is being done. In order to elicit change, we need to remain true and do something positive about it.